150 CEOs Sign Petition Urging Senate to Act on Gun Violence

Politics

On Thursday, close to 150 CEOs from various companies sent a letter to the Senate begging them to pass red flag laws and tougher background checks for all gun sales. Many of the CEOs are well known, such as Arianna Huffington from the Huffington Post and Dara Khosrowshahi, the CEO of Uber.

“There are steps Congress can, and must, take to prevent and reduce gun violence. … That’s why we urge the Senate to stand with the American public and take action on gun safety by passing a bill to require background checks on all gun sales and a strong Red Flag law that would allow courts to issue life-saving extreme risk protection orders,” the letter said.

This letter comes as the Washington Post wrote a scathing attack on Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, singling him out for what they consider failing to act on legislation sitting on his desk that could potentially save lives if passed. There’s no proof the laws would indeed save lives, but they feel entitled to act and pass something and McConnell is preventing that from happening.

The opinion piece, entitled: “How many more names will be added to the list before Mitch McConnell acts on guns?” takes a look at the many mass shootings that have happened since 1999, including the names and ages of all the victims. This is an attempt to push red flag laws into place, a law the Democrat-controlled House passed swiftly.

Senate Back in Session

With the Senate now back in session since Monday after the long August recess, these CEOs are demanding that Congress act. As the first matter of business, they want tougher universal background checks and red flag laws so law enforcement and judges can take away the gun rights of others they deem to be unfit for owning weapons.

Still, any type of gun control law is unlikely to pass. We have a Republican-controlled Senate and President Trump is the least likely president to sign it into law even if it does pass the Senate. He would most likely veto the attempt, making the bill dead in the water.

Read More

Elizabeth Warren Proposes $200 Per Month Social Security Boost

Politics

Today’s debate day for many Democratic candidates running for president in the 2020 election. Tonight, we were hear all sorts of different ideas and proposals. Just before the debate is scheduled to take place, Senator Elizabeth Warren decided to unveil her new plan to help Americans save money for retirement and social security.

In her own words: “it’s getting harder to save enough for a decent retirement.” She wants to do something about that by allowing a $200 per month increase for every single person either currently receiving Social Security or for future beneficiaries saving for retirement. According to the Massachusetts Democrat, this is the largest and most progressive increase in the program and almost 50 years. She says it’s about time the government gets serious about the depleting program.

She says that the average payment a person receives on Social Security, about $1,354 per month, is small and nowhere near enough. There are currently 64 million people who receive these benefits and many need these payments to survive. By giving a $200 per month bump, you allow them to live a bit more comfortably.

“And here’s the even scarier part: unless we act now, future retirees are going to be in even worse shape than the current ones,” she stressed. This is due to the fact that Social Security is running out of money. People are paying into it for their retirement, but the government uses what workers are currently paying into to subsidize current retirees.

Paying Back Social Security

Sen. Warren says that if she becomes president, shall expand the solvency of Social Security by 20 years and, of course, shall do that by increasing taxes on the wealthiest Americans. According to Mark Zandi, a chief economist with Moody’s Analytics, Warren’s plan would “immediately lift an estimated 4.9 million seniors out of poverty, cutting the senior poverty rate by 68 percent.”

What also wants employers who are already contributing towards their workers Social Security benefits to contribute even more. She wants to bust his number up by nearly 25%. She believes that the top earners can easily afford to boost contributions to workers by this much. Warns goal is to create a much stronger progressive Social Security system that works for the lower-and-middle class retirees.

Something definitely needs to be done as the average lifespan of Americans continues to expand. Nearly 80 million people are estimated to be drawing on Social Security as we continue to live longer. Social Security was implemented when the lifespan was shorter. Now that were living longer, more money is being drawn from the system and is quickly running out of money. It’s unknown of Warren’s plan will ever be voted into law, but either way, someone needs to help fix the problem before it’s too late.

Read More

Senator Cory Booker Unveils $3 Trillion Climate Package

Politics

Senator Cory Booker is the latest Democrat to jump onto the climate change bandwagon and offer up a plan of his own. We he called the “Environmental Justice Fund,” Booker hopes to pass a $3 trillion plan that he hopes will combat climate change and slow down the earth’s warming. 

There are already plenty of critics of this deal. Creating a $3 trillion program when the country is already trillions in debt and there are more pressing spending needs, like trillions needed to upgrade our country’s infrastructure, many opponents feel now is not the time to keep upping the spending. But Booker feels that climate change is our country’s biggest threat and it must be addressed sooner rather than later. 

“To end the real and growing threat of climate change and to create a more just country for everyone, we must heal these past mistakes and act boldly to create a green and equitable future. That’s exactly what I’ll do as president,” Booker said in a statement.

Booker also tweeted: “We’re facing a dual crisis of climate change and economic inequality—and without immediate action, the toll is unimaginable. But this is a fight I know we can win.”

The Time is Now

Many on the Democratic side feel there is no time left to combat the problem. Where the Green New Deal was too bold and mostly laughed off, even by Democrats, they still believe the threat is immediate and the cost is too high if we don’t start making changes immediately. Many are even saying we have 12 years to face the problem or we’re doomed.

“The reality is that we can’t afford not to act. We spend more than $100 billion each year solely on the health impacts of burning fossil fuels, and have spent $450 billion on climate-related disasters in the last three years alone. A recent paper in the National Bureau of Economic Research found that the U.S. economy could shrink by more than 10 percent by 2100 if we don’t act decisively on climate change,” writes Booker.

“As we set out to tackle the existential challenge of climate change, we must ensure that all people and all communities, especially the ones that have been traditionally left behind — urban and rural, communities of color, low-income, and indigenous — share in our progress. Acting together, we can and must find our common purpose, and build a sustainable and equitable future for all,” adds the statement.

More details about the plan are set to be released in the coming days, but we should expect more plans like this from the Democrats as they continue to ramp up their 2020 campaigns. Senator Booker is one top Democrats running for president. 

Read More

AOC Calls for Student Loan Forgiveness as She Makes a Payment on Her Loan

Politics

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, the outspoken congresswoman from New York, says she made a student loan debt payment while sitting in her chair preparing to make a statement on the subject of student loan forgiveness. She claims she now owes $19,000, using the moment to attack Republicans, as if they are responsible for her owing the debt.

Despite a major jump in her pay from a bartender to making $174,000 per year as a member of Congress, AOC lamented her $19,000 and says she feels accomplished bringing down her balance, but the country needs to reset and offer full student loan forgiveness. Even the fairly wealthy apparently want the government to pay their debt for them.

“I literally made a student loan payment while I was sitting here at this chair, and I looked at my balance, and it was $20,237.16,” she said. “I just made a payment that took me down to $19,000 so I feel really accomplished right now.”

Will Student Loan Debt Forgiveness Ever Happen?

It’s understandable that many people want student loan forgiveness. Even AOC is calling for it despite her high salary. Nearly every single Democratic candidate on the 2020 campaign trail has a plan to offer both student loan forgiveness and to make college free moving forward. Whether it will actually happen is another story.

President Trump hasn’t offered too many solutions to the problem. He feels if a person takes out a debt, they should be responsible for paying it back. He doesn’t think it’s fair to put that $1.53 trillion burden on the backs of taxpayers. Yet, the president did step in to help those who truly need it the most: disabled veterans.

It wasn’t too long ago when Trump signed into law a new executive order completely wiping the slate clean for veterans who were classified as 100% disabled. It also means they were free and clear of the tax burden that comes with student loan forgiveness.

“The debt of these disabled veterans will be completely erased,” Trump said. “That’s hundreds of millions of dollars of student loans debt for our disabled veterans that will be completely erased,” he said. “It was my honor to sign a Presidential Memorandum facilitating the cancellation of student loan debt for 25K of our most severely disabled Veterans. With today’s order, we express the everlasting love & loyalty of a truly grateful Nation. God bless our Vets, & God Bless America!” Trump tweeted.

Read More

Trump Again Promises to Release His Full Financial Report by 2020

Politics

In the category of “where have we seen this before,” President Trump promised via the White House press corps that he was going to release a detailed financial report before the 20/20 presidential election. It’s unknown exactly what he’s going to release, if anything, but he says it’s a detailed report of all of his personal holdings. There have been many questions about how Trump is profiting as president.

This might not be much of a promise even if he goes through with. He has to file financial disclosures anyway with the government ethics office. At least Trump seems to understand that there are many ethics questions that have been popping up over the past few months and even years about how much money the president is making while in office.

These types of questions were specifically asked in the past week after VP Mike Pence stayed in Doonbeg, Ireland, choosing to stay in one of Trump’s resorts. Another question is popped up in the past few days about whether a crew of Air Force personnel stayed at Trump’s properties in Scotland.

“At some point prior to the election, I’m going to be giving out a financial report of me, and it’ll be extremely complete,” he told reporters at the White House before leaving for a campaign rally in North Carolina.

Ethics Questions Being Raised

The big question being raised here is whether Trump is forcing the government to stay at his properties when they’re traveling abroad. He has many resorts, hotels, golf courses all over the world. He himself has stayed at these places when traveling up and down the East Coast, from Florida all the way up to New York.

Yet, these government entities and trump himself do not stay at his resorts for free. The taxpayers are paying for these stays, so that’s taxpayer money going directly into Trump’s pocket. But Trump says he doesn’t need the government staying at his hotels and he doesn’t need to make a profit from taxpayers. Hence, releasing his financial status in an attempt to quell any speculation.

“I’m going to give out my financial condition and you’ll be extremely shocked that the numbers are many, many times what you think,” Trump said. “I don’t need to have somebody take a room overnight at a hotel.”

President Trump decided not to release his tax returns in a rare move by an American president over the past few decades. He made promises during the 2016 campaign after questions were raised by Democrats about his ties to Russia. Many feel that Trump has way overestimated his worth and isn’t upfront about many questions that continue to swirl around his financial dealings.

Read More

Here’s Why Trump Wants a Weaker Dollar and How It Will Help Our Economy

Politics

It was but just yesterday when the stock market took a major dive and at one point was 900 points in the hole. News of China’s currency manipulation really struck a chord with American investors. They hate the trade war more than anything. What should have been good news for the US when it came to cutting interest rates, the stock market went down instead of up.

That’s because president Trump has announced even stronger tariffs $350 billion worth of Chinese goods. Is no doubt that the trade war hurts our economy, but the president is out for blood. He’s tired of the Chinese manipulating the currency. He’s tired of how they steal intellectual rights and technology.

As a result of yesterday’s events, now the Treasury Department has weighed in and also called China a currency manipulator. They took action to lower the value of their yuan, which makes Chinese products much cheaper in the foreign market. This means that more countries are able to trade with China because goods aren’t as expensive as they would be trading with the United States.

This essentially gives China an “unfair advantage,” forcing the International Monetary Fund and the Treasury Department to look for ways to counter this move by the world’s #2 economy. This is the first time Trump has made comments about another country’s manipulation of their currency. In fact, he accused the EU of doing the same. They deflate their currency while the value of the dollar remains really strong.

What a Strong Dollar Means

You might think having a strong dollar is a good thing. Yet, there’s a reason why other countries are devaluing their currency. Having a strong currency is not a good thing for trade. Consider exchange rates and how they would play a part in a country buying goods from another. If a country has a strong dollar like the US currently does, and your currency is weak, who would other countries rather trade with?

Surely, they would rather trade with someone currency is weak because that means they get the same products for much cheaper. This is the type of game that China’s playing. As the US increases the amount of tariffs that they place on China, their figuring out ways of getting around it by lowering the value of the yuan.

“China and Europe playing big currency manipulation game and pumping money into their system in order to compete with the USA,” President Trump wrote on Twitter. “We should MATCH, or continue being the dummies who sit back and politely watch as other countries continue to play their games – as they have for many years!”

“Mario Draghi just announced more stimulus could come, which immediately dropped the Euro against the Dollar, making it unfairly easier for them to compete against the USA. They have been getting away with this for years, along with China and others.”

Benefits of Weakening the Dollar

The value of the dollar impacts so many things here in America. If the US dollar is weakened, that means more countries can buy more U.S. goods. When we have that open trade relationship with other countries and their buying up all of our stuff, that gives a boost to many industries in our country.

They like to buy agriculture which is great for farmers. They’ll buy our cars and steel, giving a boost to manufacturers and factory workers. But when other countries manipulate their currency, it gives them an unfair advantage and takes jobs away from American workers. Trump has been displeased throughout his own presidency with the high value of the dollar.

“I want a strong dollar, but I want a dollar that does great for our country, not a dollar that’s so strong that it makes it prohibitive for us to do business with other nations and take their business,” Trump said during a speech in March, before launching into criticism of Fed Chairman Jerome Powell. “We have a gentleman that likes a very strong dollar in the Fed,” he added, referring to Powell.

Read More

Dow Drops 500 Points as China Punches Back in Trade War

Politics

In an escalating trade war, nobody wins until a deal is done and the war is finished. There are casualties on both sides as both Pres. Trump and China’s President Xi continue to trade blows in an attempt to declare victory over the other. The problem is, China and the United States are both two of the world’s largest economies. This isn’t settling well with the rest of the world.

After Pres. Trump threatened to add new tariffs on Chinese goods, Beijing responded in a way that shows that they will not take this lightly. As Americans woke up this morning, the Dow futures were tanking upon news that China was going to allow their currency to sink to a new historical low. They are also telling state-owned companies not to buy U.S. agricultural products, signaling that the uneasy truce declared a few weeks ago is now over.

By lowering the value of the Chinese Yuan, it makes Chinese goods much easier to buy from foreign countries because those products are much cheaper. This is really one of the main areas of attack for China, as the United States dollar is one of the strongest currencies out there. That means more people are going to be buying Chinese products because they’re cheaper.

Recently, Mexico took the place of China is our country’s top trading partner. The number of imports we have coming from China has fallen about 12% at the start of the year. That means we’re buying less Chinese goods. The Pres. Trump is not happy about what he calls “currency manipulation.” It’s these tactics that have forced him into fighting this trade war to begin with.

“China dropped the price of their currency to an almost historic low,” Trump tweeted on Monday. “It’s called “currency manipulation.”

New Tariffs

Despite receiving many objections from his own advisors, Pres. Trump announced that he would place a 10% tariff on all remaining Chinese goods beginning September 1. Even stated that he could do much more than he is when it comes to placing tariffs, threatening that he could go from 10% to 25% or higher. He’s already backed up his threat by placing a 25% tariff on over $250 billion worth of Chinese goods, escalating the matter further.

One weakness China knows the US has is the impact of the trade war on our agricultural products. Our farms have taken a major blow, forcing the government to send billions of dollars in aid to our struggling farmers. A wetter than average spring also forced many farmers to get a late start on planting, if they even got a chance to plant at all, which will only add to the chaos come harvest time.

This is probably why Beijing also ordered state-owned companies to stop buying US agricultural products. This puts even more pressure on the system. China used to be the largest buyer of US soybeans, as much a 70%. But soybean imports to China have fallen 97% since the start of the trade war.

“China has strategically gamed the tariffs by slashing their prices and by devaluing their currency,” White House trade advisor Peter Navarro told “Fox News Sunday.”

“Since the tariffs were put in place back in 2018, the Chinese yuan fell by almost 10 percent, so they have offset virtually all these tariffs and the consumers are not seeing any price hikes in any significant way … We could have a bigger question about whether tariffs, in general, might cause rising consumer prices, but not in this case.”

Read More

Presidential Candidate Elizabeth Warren Warns of Impending Economic Disaster

Politics

Earlier this week on Monday, Democratic presidential candidate Elizabeth Warren warns that she sees signs that the United States economy is about to face a major economic disaster in the next year two. He claims that there are many warning lights that are flashing and that the chance of a downturn is ‘growing.’

Warren currently serves as a US senator and is one of the top candidates in an extremely crowded Democrat field. While she is looking to challenge Pres. Trump in the 2020 election, she’s calling on Congress to do something immediately to fix the problem. Of course, one might ask what anyone can do when she’s the only one seeing the signs.

Economists are saying the complete opposite. There’s no sign of recession. While there are a few factors, like a trade war with China, that is impacting the economy, our economy has never been better in its entire history. More people have jobs now than ever before. Yet, Warren says that Congress must act “before another crisis costs America’s families their homes, jobs and savings.”

The stock market is currently hitting all-time highs, the economy has been expanding for a record 10 years, unemployment is at its lowest point in our history, inflation is low and wages are rising. Yet, despite all of this, Warren is warning of major signs that something major is brewing.

Just Political Fodder?

Considering there’s no evidence of Warren’s charge, it looks to be nothing more than an attempt by Democrat to downplay the great economy. Pres. Trump is currently getting most of the credit for regulation cuts and tax cuts that do seem to be working to stimulate the strongest economy we’ve ever had.

Maybe Warren does have a little bit of Nostradamus in her. She claimed back in 2008 that she had issued many warnings about the impending economic crash that turned into a severe recession. She claims that no one heeded her warnings then and most likely will not listen to them now. “The people in power wouldn’t listen,” Warren said.

The economy is always one of the top major issues that come into play during an election cycle. It’s extremely difficult for Democrats to explain away the great economy. Instead, they’re resorting to fear tactics to counter any positive thoughts about how well we’re currently doing. That doesn’t mean we should dismiss Warren’s comments out of hand.

Any economy is fragile. All it takes is one event to change the course of history. Bubbles burst and rates rise. We should all be prepared at all times for the worst to happen. So while Warren’s words right now have no merit, at least she’s getting us thinking about the future.

Read More

2020 Presidential Candidates Withheld Pay from Staff to Appear Richer

Politics

When you’re a presidential candidate, appearances make all the difference. You want to show that you’re a leader amongst the pack. One way of standing out is showing you have a lot of money. Having money is a sign that you’re being supported by your fans and the people who want you to be elected. The more popular you are, the more money you should have in your election war chest.

One thing candidates have to do is be honest and be held accountable for the money they receive in campaign contributions. They must file with the FEC to offer a true accounting of their spending. The news media loves to harp on which candidate has the most money to spend because having money determines how long you can run a viable campaign.

A lack of support means less money coming in and vice versa. But some candidates play with the numbers to appear to be richer than they are. Every quarter, the FEC releases how much each candidate pulled in. By looking at these numbers, we can see what some candidates are doing to inflate their donation dollars.

Senator Amy Klobuchar is one example. You can track her expenses through the end of one quarter, but her spending dramatically exploded on the first day of April, the start of a new fundraising quarter. It shows that Klobuchar put off spending until the quarter was over, putting a huge spin on how much money she has in the bank.

Putting Things Off

This move allowed her to claim she had $7 million while if she conducted her spending spree BEFORE the quarter was over, it would’ve revealed she had only $6.35 million. While that might not seem like much of a difference, the $7 million reported makes her look better and among the candidates pulling in the most money.

Looking at campaign finance records, Klobuchar is just one of four presidential candidates doing the same. They’re playing with their money and being choosy when they spend so it can appear as if they have more money than they do. One tactic is delaying payment to staffers. It looks like the four same Democratic candidates all put off paying their staffers at the end of June and waited to pay their staff until the start of July to inflate their fundraising numbers.

The three other presidential campaigns spotted pulling this tactic include John Delaney from Maryland, Michael Bennett of Colorado, and Jay Inslee of Washington. These candidates stated that it’s the way the payment period was structured, blaming it on the end of the period falling on a Sunday. The problem is, the common practice would be for checks to be cut the Friday before the weekend.

“I haven’t heard of this practice before but I am not surprised,” said Kim McMurray, an executive council member of the Campaign Workers Guild and a former organizer for 2020 contender Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT). “FEC timing deadlines are such an important moment for campaigns to show enthusiasm, support, etc. so campaigns want to show the largest number possible.”

“It is very disappointing if this came at the expense of the workers,” McMurray added.

Read More

Chinese Exporters Finding a Unique Way to Skirt Past Trump’s Tariffs

Politics

Whether you agree or disagree with President Trump’s policies regarding tariffs, you have to appreciate the sheer genius of businessmen. They’re going to make money any way they can. If they’re not making enough of a profit, they’ll get around their obstacles. That’s exactly what some crafty Chinese exporters have done to get around Trump’s tariffs on their country.

The scheme? To slap “Made in Vietnam” labels on their Chinese goods. It’s sort of brilliant when you think about it. At least, until you get caught. Vietnam said this week that they found dozens of fake certificates and illegal transfers from Chinese companies trying to get around the tariffs. These products include everything from steel to agriculture and textiles.

Earlier this year, President Trump slapped a 25% tariff on $250 million worth of Chinese goods after trade talks have stalled. He’s currently threatening another $300 billion if the government doesn’t come back to the negotiating table in good faith. Not only does Trump feel like the balance is weighed heavily in China’s favor, but they’ve been caught stealing intellectual property. This doesn’t sit well with the president who has been calling out the country since his campaign.

“It’s always a cat-and-mouse game,” said Fred Burke, managing partner at law firm Baker & McKenzie (Vietnam) Ltd. “As long as people are willing to take risks in search of those arbitrages of say 25 percent duties, it’s very difficult to enforce.” Now Vietnam is worried they’ll be hit with a massive fine for allowing the ruse to go on as long as it did.

A New Way to Trade

One way Vietnam found the problem was the massive and sudden shift in Vietnamese products to the United States. China’s shipments have dropped just as quickly. Vietnam itself was asking how this increase in exports happened. Some of it does have to do with an ever-changing supply chain, like the U.S. buying more from Vietnam than China as of late.

Still, many question how much of those numbers are actually accurate and what are phony. Examples of this type of fraud include changing goods made in China to say “Made in Vietnam.” One Chinese plywood manufacturer started sending their goods to the U.S. through a Vietnamese plywood company to hide what it was doing.

“A cottage industry for circumventing U.S. tariffs will likely bloom, given the high tariff rates and huge potential profit,” said Chua Hak Bin, a senior economist at Maybank Kim Eng Research Pte. in Singapore. “ASEAN governments will likely crackdown on such re-routing for fear of being seen as a backdoor,” Chua said, referring to the Association of Southeast Asian Nations.

“Questionable shipments are likely to be a ‘relatively small’ portion of China’s total exports to the U.S.,” said Rahul Kapoor, a senior analyst at Bloomberg Intelligence in Singapore. “There will always be leakages and workarounds to avoid tariffs, but we do not see it as a widespread phenomenon,” Kapoor said.

Read More